Member Md. Mamun Hossain
MemberForum Replies Created
-
That’s a statement outlining the broad strategic goals for sustainable and efficient feed manufacturing, rather than a question.
However, based on the context you’ve provided, I can summarize the four key areas of strategic focus necessary to achieve those goals:
1. Ingredient Selection & Nutritional Strategy
This focuses on the “what” and the “why” of the feed formula:
* Balancing Needs: Selecting ingredients that meet the precise nutritional requirements of the target animal (to ensure health and performance) while simultaneously considering the environmental and social impacts of those ingredients.
* Alternative/Sustainable Sourcing: Exploring and incorporating novel or regional ingredients (e.g., insect protein, single-cell protein, co-products) to reduce reliance on major crops like soy and corn, thereby decreasing land-use pressure and deforestation risk.
* Precision Formulation: Utilizing advanced analysis (like near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy or NIR) and software to formulate diets with minimal nutrient excesses, which reduces feed cost and the excretion of nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus into the environment.
2. Procurement & Supply Chain Logistics
This focuses on the “where” and the “how” of obtaining ingredients:
* Sustainable Sourcing Policies: Implementing strict standards (e.g., certifications for sustainable soy or palm oil) to ensure all ingredients are sourced responsibly, avoiding commodities linked to deforestation or unethical labor practices.
* Supply Chain Transparency: Tracking the origin of ingredients to assess their true environmental footprint and identify risks.
* Optimizing Transport: Strategically locating production facilities and choosing ingredient suppliers to minimize the distance and mode of transport, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
3. Manufacturing & Production Processes
This focuses on the “when” and the “how much” of feed production:
* Energy Efficiency: Investing in modern equipment and process improvements to reduce the energy consumption (and associated emissions) per ton of feed produced. This includes optimizing pelleting, grinding, and drying processes.
* Waste Minimization: Implementing procedures to reduce feed loss and spillage during handling, mixing, and storage, ensuring resource utilization is maximized.
* Feed Safety & Quality: Maintaining rigorous quality control to prevent contamination or poor mixing, which would lead to inefficient animal performance and potential waste.
4. Environmental and Social Impact Measurement
This involves the “tracking” and “reporting” required for continuous improvement:
* Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Quantifying the environmental burden (e.g., carbon footprint, water usage) of various feed formulations and production pathways.
* Social Metrics: Evaluating the social impact of the supply chain, including labor practices, community engagement, and food security contributions.
* Setting Targets: Establishing clear, measurable, and achievable sustainability goals (e.g., reducing carbon intensity by a set percentage) and regularly reporting progress to stakeholders.That’s a statement outlining the broad strategic goals for sustainable and efficient feed manufacturing, rather than a question.
However, based on the context you’ve provided, I can summarize the four key areas of strategic focus necessary to achieve those goals:
1. Ingredient Selection & Nutritional Strategy
This focuses on the “what” and the “why” of the feed formula:
* Balancing Needs: Selecting ingredients that meet the precise nutritional requirements of the target animal (to ensure health and performance) while simultaneously considering the environmental and social impacts of those ingredients.
* Alternative/Sustainable Sourcing: Exploring and incorporating novel or regional ingredients (e.g., insect protein, single-cell protein, co-products) to reduce reliance on major crops like soy and corn, thereby decreasing land-use pressure and deforestation risk.
* Precision Formulation: Utilizing advanced analysis (like near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy or NIR) and software to formulate diets with minimal nutrient excesses, which reduces feed cost and the excretion of nutrients like nitrogen and phosphorus into the environment.
2. Procurement & Supply Chain Logistics
This focuses on the “where” and the “how” of obtaining ingredients:
* Sustainable Sourcing Policies: Implementing strict standards (e.g., certifications for sustainable soy or palm oil) to ensure all ingredients are sourced responsibly, avoiding commodities linked to deforestation or unethical labor practices.
* Supply Chain Transparency: Tracking the origin of ingredients to assess their true environmental footprint and identify risks.
* Optimizing Transport: Strategically locating production facilities and choosing ingredient suppliers to minimize the distance and mode of transport, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
3. Manufacturing & Production Processes
This focuses on the “when” and the “how much” of feed production:
* Energy Efficiency: Investing in modern equipment and process improvements to reduce the energy consumption (and associated emissions) per ton of feed produced. This includes optimizing pelleting, grinding, and drying processes.
* Waste Minimization: Implementing procedures to reduce feed loss and spillage during handling, mixing, and storage, ensuring resource utilization is maximized.
* Feed Safety & Quality: Maintaining rigorous quality control to prevent contamination or poor mixing, which would lead to inefficient animal performance and potential waste.
4. Environmental and Social Impact Measurement
This involves the “tracking” and “reporting” required for continuous improvement:
* Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Quantifying the environmental burden (e.g., carbon footprint, water usage) of various feed formulations and production pathways.
* Social Metrics: Evaluating the social impact of the supply chain, including labor practices, community engagement, and food security contributions.
* Setting Targets: Establishing clear, measurable, and achievable sustainability goals (e.g., reducing carbon intensity by a set percentage) and regularly reporting progress to stakeholders. -
Feed analysis of different samples from the same type of feed can produce different results due to a combination of natural variation in the feed itself, issues with sampling technique, and analytical variations in the testing process.
Here is a breakdown of the main reasons for these differences:
1. Non-Uniformity in the Feed (Actual Variation)
Even within a single “type” of feed, its composition can vary significantly due to several factors:
* Ingredient Variability: The raw materials (e.g., grains, hay, protein meals) used in the feed naturally vary in their nutrient content based on growing conditions (soil, weather), harvesting time and methods, and storage/conservation processes. For example, the protein content of grain can differ from one field to the next.
* Manufacturing Inconsistencies: For processed or mixed feeds, variation can occur during production:
* Inadequate Mixing: If the feed is not mixed for the correct time or if the equipment is worn, micro-ingredients (like vitamins and minerals) may not be uniformly distributed, leading to “hot spots” or “cold spots” of nutrients.
* Segregation: Even after proper mixing, ingredients can separate (segregate) during transport or delivery due to differences in particle size, shape, or density. This means the feed at the top of a bin might be different from the feed at the bottom.
* Moisture Content: The percentage of water in the feed can fluctuate based on storage conditions and can dramatically affect the nutrient concentration when results are reported on an “as-fed” basis.
2. Sampling Error
The biggest cause of variation often comes from the way the sample is collected. Any analysis only represents the sample submitted, so if the sample isn’t truly representative of the entire batch, the result will be inaccurate for the whole lot.
* Non-Representative Sample: Taking a sample from only one location (e.g., the top of a bag or bin) will likely miss the overall average, especially if segregation has occurred.
* Insufficient Subsamples: A single composite sample should be made from multiple subsamples collected randomly across the entire “lot” of feed (e.g., 10-20 cores from a hay bale lot, or multiple grabs from a bulk bin). Not collecting enough subsamples increases error.
* Sample Integrity Issues: Improper handling, such as allowing a moist sample to heat up or spoil before analysis, can alter its composition (e.g., loss of digestible nutrients).
3. Laboratory/Analytical Variation
Variations can also be introduced during the testing process, though reputable labs take steps to minimize this.
* Method Differences: Different laboratories or even different methods within the same lab (e.g., wet chemistry vs. Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy, or NIR) can yield slightly different results. NIR results, for instance, are predictions based on calibrations from wet chemistry and may show more variation.
* Precision and Accuracy: All lab tests have inherent variation.
* Precision refers to the consistency of results from repeated tests.
* Accuracy refers to how close the result is to the true value.
* Sample Preparation: Even a small sample must be properly ground and mixed in the lab to ensure the tiny portion analyzed in a specific test is representative of the submitted composite sample.Feed analysis of different samples from the same type of feed can produce different results due to a combination of natural variation in the feed itself, issues with sampling technique, and analytical variations in the testing process.
Here is a breakdown of the main reasons for these differences:
1. Non-Uniformity in the Feed (Actual Variation)
Even within a single “type” of feed, its composition can vary significantly due to several factors:
* Ingredient Variability: The raw materials (e.g., grains, hay, protein meals) used in the feed naturally vary in their nutrient content based on growing conditions (soil, weather), harvesting time and methods, and storage/conservation processes. For example, the protein content of grain can differ from one field to the next.
* Manufacturing Inconsistencies: For processed or mixed feeds, variation can occur during production:
* Inadequate Mixing: If the feed is not mixed for the correct time or if the equipment is worn, micro-ingredients (like vitamins and minerals) may not be uniformly distributed, leading to “hot spots” or “cold spots” of nutrients.
* Segregation: Even after proper mixing, ingredients can separate (segregate) during transport or delivery due to differences in particle size, shape, or density. This means the feed at the top of a bin might be different from the feed at the bottom.
* Moisture Content: The percentage of water in the feed can fluctuate based on storage conditions and can dramatically affect the nutrient concentration when results are reported on an “as-fed” basis.
2. Sampling Error
The biggest cause of variation often comes from the way the sample is collected. Any analysis only represents the sample submitted, so if the sample isn’t truly representative of the entire batch, the result will be inaccurate for the whole lot.
* Non-Representative Sample: Taking a sample from only one location (e.g., the top of a bag or bin) will likely miss the overall average, especially if segregation has occurred.
* Insufficient Subsamples: A single composite sample should be made from multiple subsamples collected randomly across the entire “lot” of feed (e.g., 10-20 cores from a hay bale lot, or multiple grabs from a bulk bin). Not collecting enough subsamples increases error.
* Sample Integrity Issues: Improper handling, such as allowing a moist sample to heat up or spoil before analysis, can alter its composition (e.g., loss of digestible nutrients).
3. Laboratory/Analytical Variation
Variations can also be introduced during the testing process, though reputable labs take steps to minimize this.
* Method Differences: Different laboratories or even different methods within the same lab (e.g., wet chemistry vs. Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy, or NIR) can yield slightly different results. NIR results, for instance, are predictions based on calibrations from wet chemistry and may show more variation.
* Precision and Accuracy: All lab tests have inherent variation.
* Precision refers to the consistency of results from repeated tests.
* Accuracy refers to how close the result is to the true value.
* Sample Preparation: Even a small sample must be properly ground and mixed in the lab to ensure the tiny portion analyzed in a specific test is representative of the submitted composite sample. -
The most effective biosecurity approach is a holistic, integrated system that combines multiple defensive layers to prevent the introduction and spread of disease (an approach often called biocontainment and bioexclusion).
The best practices are organized around three critical pillars: Control of Movement, Hygiene & Sanitation, and Animal/Plant Health Management.
1. Control of Movement (The Walls) 🚫
This pillar is focused on bioexclusion—keeping pathogens off the farm. It is the first and most vital defense.
* Access Management & Zoning:
* Perimeter Security: Establish a clear Line of Separation (LOS) or Perimeter Buffer Area (PBA) with fencing and clear signage to define the farm’s clean and dirty areas.
* Visitor Protocols: Strictly limit and log all visitors and non-essential personnel. Require all visitors to wear clean, farm-specific protective clothing (boot covers, coveralls) or have them pass through a shower-in/shower-out facility if the risk is high.
* Vehicle and Equipment Control:
* Designated Parking: All personal vehicles and external delivery trucks must be parked in a designated area outside the LOS.
* Clean In, Clean Out: All essential vehicles and shared equipment (e.g., trailers, feed trucks, tillage equipment) that must enter the controlled area should be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected upon entry and exit.
* Source and Supply Management:
* Quarantine for New Stock: Isolate all new animals or plants (livestock, seeds, cuttings, etc.) for a minimum of 21–30 days in a designated quarantine area away from the main production area to monitor for disease.
* Reputable Sources: Only purchase inputs (feed, water, supplies) from vendors with certified biosecurity and quality control programs.
2. Hygiene and Sanitation (The Cleaning) 🧼
This pillar focuses on routine practices to eliminate pathogens that may have breached the perimeter.
* Cleaning and Disinfection (C&D):
* Footbaths and Hand Hygiene: Place functioning footbaths (with a regularly changed, approved disinfectant) at every entry point to production areas. Require mandatory handwashing/sanitizing.
* Scheduled Cleaning: Implement a strict schedule for the cleaning and disinfection of all housing, equipment, tools, and feed/water delivery systems. Cleaning (removing organic matter like dirt and manure) must always precede disinfection for the chemicals to be effective.
* Waste and Mortality Management:
* Prompt Disposal: Collect and dispose of all dead animals/plants promptly and safely (e.g., composting, incineration, rendering) to prevent them from becoming a source of contamination for the rest of the farm.
* Manure Control: Manage manure and effluent to prevent runoff or use it in a way that minimizes disease spread (e.g., composting before field spreading).
* Pest and Vector Control:
* Implement aggressive programs to control rodents, wild birds, and insects (flies, beetles), as they are significant carriers of disease. Secure feed storage and housing to exclude them.
3. Animal/Plant Health Management (The Defense) 🩺
This pillar focuses on biocontainment (preventing spread within the farm) and maximizing the internal resistance of the stock.
* Monitoring and Surveillance:
* Daily Inspection: Staff must be trained to conduct daily health checks and look for signs of disease (unusual deaths, changes in eating/production, visible symptoms).
* Traceability: Maintain detailed, up-to-date records of all animal/plant movements, vaccinations, treatments, and production data.
* Veterinary/Agronomic Program:
* Work with a specialist (Veterinarian or Agronomist) to establish a comprehensive program including vaccinations, disease testing, and parasite control appropriate for the local area and stock.
* All-In, All-Out (AIAO):
* Where possible (especially in poultry and swine), utilize an All-In, All-Out system where a group of animals is brought in, raised, and removed together. The empty facility is then thoroughly cleaned and disinfected before the next group arrives, effectively breaking disease cycles.The most effective biosecurity approach is a holistic, integrated system that combines multiple defensive layers to prevent the introduction and spread of disease (an approach often called biocontainment and bioexclusion).
The best practices are organized around three critical pillars: Control of Movement, Hygiene & Sanitation, and Animal/Plant Health Management.
1. Control of Movement (The Walls) 🚫
This pillar is focused on bioexclusion—keeping pathogens off the farm. It is the first and most vital defense.
* Access Management & Zoning:
* Perimeter Security: Establish a clear Line of Separation (LOS) or Perimeter Buffer Area (PBA) with fencing and clear signage to define the farm’s clean and dirty areas.
* Visitor Protocols: Strictly limit and log all visitors and non-essential personnel. Require all visitors to wear clean, farm-specific protective clothing (boot covers, coveralls) or have them pass through a shower-in/shower-out facility if the risk is high.
* Vehicle and Equipment Control:
* Designated Parking: All personal vehicles and external delivery trucks must be parked in a designated area outside the LOS.
* Clean In, Clean Out: All essential vehicles and shared equipment (e.g., trailers, feed trucks, tillage equipment) that must enter the controlled area should be thoroughly cleaned and disinfected upon entry and exit.
* Source and Supply Management:
* Quarantine for New Stock: Isolate all new animals or plants (livestock, seeds, cuttings, etc.) for a minimum of 21–30 days in a designated quarantine area away from the main production area to monitor for disease.
* Reputable Sources: Only purchase inputs (feed, water, supplies) from vendors with certified biosecurity and quality control programs.
2. Hygiene and Sanitation (The Cleaning) 🧼
This pillar focuses on routine practices to eliminate pathogens that may have breached the perimeter.
* Cleaning and Disinfection (C&D):
* Footbaths and Hand Hygiene: Place functioning footbaths (with a regularly changed, approved disinfectant) at every entry point to production areas. Require mandatory handwashing/sanitizing.
* Scheduled Cleaning: Implement a strict schedule for the cleaning and disinfection of all housing, equipment, tools, and feed/water delivery systems. Cleaning (removing organic matter like dirt and manure) must always precede disinfection for the chemicals to be effective.
* Waste and Mortality Management:
* Prompt Disposal: Collect and dispose of all dead animals/plants promptly and safely (e.g., composting, incineration, rendering) to prevent them from becoming a source of contamination for the rest of the farm.
* Manure Control: Manage manure and effluent to prevent runoff or use it in a way that minimizes disease spread (e.g., composting before field spreading).
* Pest and Vector Control:
* Implement aggressive programs to control rodents, wild birds, and insects (flies, beetles), as they are significant carriers of disease. Secure feed storage and housing to exclude them.
3. Animal/Plant Health Management (The Defense) 🩺
This pillar focuses on biocontainment (preventing spread within the farm) and maximizing the internal resistance of the stock.
* Monitoring and Surveillance:
* Daily Inspection: Staff must be trained to conduct daily health checks and look for signs of disease (unusual deaths, changes in eating/production, visible symptoms).
* Traceability: Maintain detailed, up-to-date records of all animal/plant movements, vaccinations, treatments, and production data.
* Veterinary/Agronomic Program:
* Work with a specialist (Veterinarian or Agronomist) to establish a comprehensive program including vaccinations, disease testing, and parasite control appropriate for the local area and stock.
* All-In, All-Out (AIAO):
* Where possible (especially in poultry and swine), utilize an All-In, All-Out system where a group of animals is brought in, raised, and removed together. The empty facility is then thoroughly cleaned and disinfected before the next group arrives, effectively breaking disease cycles. -
This is an accurate and comprehensive summary of the primary role of management in the feed manufacturing industry.
It correctly identifies the four critical pillars of management in this specialized sector:
* Strategic Focus: “strategically plan, organize, and control.”
* Product Quality & Safety: “produce high-quality, safe, and cost-effective animal feed,” and “ensuring strict quality and safety standards.” This is particularly vital in feed manufacturing due to its direct link to food safety (the ‘farm-to-fork’ chain).
* Operations/Efficiency: “overseeing raw material procurement, optimizing production processes.” This highlights the crucial role of supply chain and operational excellence.
* Financial/Personnel: “managing personnel and financials to maximize efficiency and profitability.”
The summary is excellent for its brevity and coverage of the entire value chain, from procurement to final financial outcomes.This is an accurate and comprehensive summary of the primary role of management in the feed manufacturing industry.
It correctly identifies the four critical pillars of management in this specialized sector:
* Strategic Focus: “strategically plan, organize, and control.”
* Product Quality & Safety: “produce high-quality, safe, and cost-effective animal feed,” and “ensuring strict quality and safety standards.” This is particularly vital in feed manufacturing due to its direct link to food safety (the ‘farm-to-fork’ chain).
* Operations/Efficiency: “overseeing raw material procurement, optimizing production processes.” This highlights the crucial role of supply chain and operational excellence.
* Financial/Personnel: “managing personnel and financials to maximize efficiency and profitability.”
The summary is excellent for its brevity and coverage of the entire value chain, from procurement to final financial outcomes. -
Good
Thanks
-
Good suggestion
-
The temperature is becoming increasing now in some part of the sub Saharan Africa mostly Nigeria, so I encourage the farmers to please use anti stress so as to reduce sudden mortality which can reduce the economic impact.
-
The role of management started are :
site selection.
staff management.
salary or wages to be pay.
raw materials procurement.(locally or importation)
Good manufacturing practise.
design of organogram.
-
It can be seen that the main routes for phage delivery are topical, oral, systemic, and airways for humans. In animals, the topical and oral routes are the most used. To combat infections in plant species, spraying the plant’s phyllosphere or drenching the soil are the most commonly used methods
-
The primary role of management in the feed manufacturing industry is to strategically plan, organize, and control all aspects of the business to produce high-quality, safe, and cost-effective animal feed. This encompasses overseeing raw material procurement, optimizing production processes, ensuring strict quality and safety standards, and managing personnel and financials to maximize efficiency and profitability.
-
The primary role of management in the feed manufacturing industry is to strategically plan, organize, and control all aspects of the business to produce high-quality, safe, and cost-effective animal feed. This encompasses overseeing raw material procurement, optimizing production processes, ensuring strict quality and safety standards, and managing personnel and financials to maximize efficiency and profitability.
-
What are the most effective biosecurity approach?
-
The most promising avenues for developing durable, cost-effective delivery systems for bacteriophages involve microencapsulation with various biopolymers and designing specialized feed matrices. These methods protect the phages from heat, water, and stomach acid, ensuring a viable and effective dose reaches the target bacteria in an animal’s gut. The ideal approach often involves a combination of techniques and is tailored to specific animal species and phage characteristics.
-
Maintaining efficient and sustainable feed manufacturing operations requires a strategic approach to ingredient selection and procurement that balances nutritional needs with environmental and social impacts. This involves optimizing sourcing, supply chain logistics, and production processes.
-
Even with samples taken from the same feed, results can vary due to several factors throughout the testing process, including inherent variability in raw ingredients, issues with sampling procedures, inconsistencies in sample preparation, and limitations of the analytical methods themselves. These variations can impact the accuracy of nutritional and safety assessments.
